Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Apple Pay Exposes Insecure Bank Policies Date: 22 Mar 2015 13:18:26 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <200320151703579843%michelle@michelle.org> <550da658$0$42924$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> <550e1690$0$14787$b1db1813$46decd27@news.astraweb.com> X-Trace: individual.net LwE1UiusHB46xWlIKnHqPgxVec3uYEQ5mOfonaPDF9nyNjCxr0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:0sM0n7r6qmaf9rL3SN2crz8lu84= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.ipad:46776 comp.sys.mac.system:71804 On 2015-03-22, JF Mezei wrote: > > The problem here is that the focus on customer support may have been > to explain how Apple Pay works with no focus/training and maybe toold > to authenticate the customer. Based on what? Or are you just wildly speculating with no evidence at all again? > May not have been clear to the staff that the alleged customer > was routed to them because automated card activation flagged the person > as high risk. Again, based on what? Nothing? > Once the customer is handed over to the bank to activate the card, it is > 100% the bank's fault for activating it. Absolutely. The bank is also at fault for not disabling these accounts after they were initially stolen. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR