Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Apple Watch: The Disappointments Date: 13 Mar 2015 23:48:37 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <130320151818125521%nospam@nospam.invalid> <130320152225078813%timstreater@greenbee.net> <130320152254143630%timstreater@greenbee.net> X-Trace: individual.net dr/iUQhYlloMXL2nxdrW1wLpm2UHIFBnbIi9pKOwcDGkAIFPak Cancel-Lock: sha1:VSrRv15Pu+9DodFR4v0z3+RfiVI= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:70994 On 2015-03-13, Tim Streater wrote: > In article , Kurt > Ullman wrote: > >>In article <130320152225078813%timstreater@greenbee.net>, >> Tim Streater wrote: >> >>> Personally I think this device will fail, because it doesn't give me >>> anything I need. But then neither does a smartphone or satnav, for the >>> most part. >> >>So, what you are saying is that you personally thinking it will fail is >>a pretty good indicator of success? > > Look, I can see (just about) that a smartphone or satnav could be > useful. Uh huh. I wish I had been around to see your reaction to smart phones and navigation systems *before* they were proven successes. Something tells me you would have predicted their utter failure, just like smart watches. : ) -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR