Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: OT? using screen via ssh Date: 11 Mar 2015 20:22:24 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: individual.net rj3nWIdRjOjzjdILb1Px0AMowbwaUDJiXY4fc2tHU1d7ImxQWF Cancel-Lock: sha1:h1qBvcWzONwzyfleqaB9rIujk4U= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:70908 On 2015-03-11, Alan Baker wrote: > On 2015-03-11 19:24:47 +0000, Lewis said: > >> True, but it runs a different instance of bash than the one that ran >> screen in the first place. >> >> tmux sounds interesting. > > I don't think there is an instance of bash that ran "in the first place". > > Straight from the Mac OS X (Mavericks/10.9.4) ssh man page: > > " If command is specified, it is executed on the remote host INSTEAD of > a login shell." Naturally. I use screen a lot on remote computers, and it's no effort at all to first establish an ssh connection to get a shell and then run screen afterward. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR