Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Apple Time Capsule -- Unknown User
Date: 15 Feb 2015 01:39:58 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <ckabneF6orpU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <cjqoubF4fg7U1@mid.individual.net> <cjrt5jFd7oeU1@mid.individual.net> <t51pqb-vls.ln1@news.chingola.ch> <slrnmdks1v.10qr.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> <cjvasbFarplU2@mid.individual.net> <slrnmdl22u.117m.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> <cjvkl4Fde31U1@mid.individual.net> <slrnmdmj97.13ch.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> <110220150824085780%michelle@michelle.org> <slrnmdo1qi.14cj.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> <ck3qkcFfmsdU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnmdpfii.16bi.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> <ck3u58Fgf2pU1@mid.individual.net> <U-idnZVcM5EO7ULJnZ2dnUU7-aGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ck9cgoFrlj4U3@mid.individual.net> <slrnmdvsgs.2hjh.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org>
X-Trace: individual.net 7kfy2yPXi5GtjwyaXLqyLQBi3zHgv7yE81pao/V2Ql5qPImYFr
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kMoTx2fFvVg4rnOrGRZrGjhP6V0=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:69789

On 2015-02-15, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> Okay, so one time? In band camp? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> was all, like:
>> On 2015-02-14, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>>> On 2015.02.12 10:11 , Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not someone who is really determined and has the know-how. WPA has been
>>>> cracked before by those who really want to get in:
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.pcworld.com/article/153396/wifi_hacked.html>
>>>
>>> WPA2 is what people use.  Should be, anyway.  It's no surprise that that 
>>> article is nearly 7 years old.
>
>> The point is eventually it can and probably will be done by someone who
>> is determined with the right resources. 
>
> Maybe. Someday. Possibly. That has nothing to do with MAC filtering.

I'm not the one who brought it up. In fact, I have stated from the
beginning that MAC filtering and encryption are not mutually exclusive.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR