Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,alt.windows7.general,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Date: 27 Jan 2015 20:18:31 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <54c4fb06$0$11284$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> <250120151125543488%nospam@nospam.invalid> <250120151335330185%nospam@nospam.invalid> <280120150857051498%YourName@YourISP.com> X-Trace: individual.net DpuLnJxReeIl+YX9ie5dQAEZTObQKG7GptLyRbf5/s4Ia5cxPy Cancel-Lock: sha1:Srra4sqjYaO14RMO3ZPUyUe5JEk= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:69139 On 2015-01-27, Your Name wrote: > In article , Jasen Betts > wrote: >> On 2015-01-25, Sage wrote: >> > nospam wrote, on Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:35:33 -0500: >> >> >> >> fonts are *very* complex, and basically works of art. >> > >> > I could make do with CourierNew and Helvetica. >> > You're implying they are works of art. >> > I disagree. >> > >> > They're just stinking basic characters that have been around >> > for thousands of years. >> >> nah, any font containg a glyph for the letter u is less than 1000 years >> old. > > Which explains why Americans leave the letter u out of words like > "colour" ... they're still 1000 years behind everyone else. ;-) No thanks. One less letter to type is an improvement. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR