Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Linus rant on HFS+ Date: 26 Jan 2015 02:00:02 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <54c59c6b$0$25069$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com> X-Trace: individual.net 7xj5quU2WtmFoiJhNNfmGgfM7umZFTMeson2elA3E8UMVJ/xXH Cancel-Lock: sha1:06DM2dVaw/6jNH7Xcg1pv4K3SIk= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:68981 On 2015-01-26, JF Mezei wrote: > > Linus Torvalds: Apple's HFS+ is probably the worst file system ever > >> http://www.itworld.com/article/2868393/linus-torvalds-apples-hfs-is-probably-the-worst-file-system-ever.html > > > His hate of HFS+ seems to be focus on its case insensitive nature. > > Aside from Linus "slight" bias against Apple and HFS+, is there anything > that supports his rant that case insensitive makes for bad file system ? > > The only thing I could think of is the overhead of having to store the > file name in a normalised fashion (for lookups) and the original > case-preserved filename which is displayed. (I assume this is how it > works). > > Is this significant ? If you have to ask... The author of the article asserts that case insensitivity "causes a lot of problems", but I have yet to see these supposed problems in the almost 30 years of using HFS in Mac OS. How has it "caused problems" for you? Useless troll. Good work. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR