Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Mike Barnes Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,alt.windows7.general,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:28:00 +0000 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net RDAZD2dXeYSoj64p6p/bwgQLxThU0WrD6wh9EaXbeVCew37A0n Cancel-Lock: sha1:OFpjmgf4d2+NSEppC18VrrnhAbY= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:68868 Mayayana wrote: > |I want to be as neutral as possible when posting to political forums. > | I use Panopticlick as my test of my browser fingerprint. > | > > What do you mean by posting to political forums? > If you're posting comments then what does your > screen size matter? Anonymity is enhanced by having a commonly-used profile, and your profile includes screen size and colour depth as reported by the browser. > [snipped the rest - I think you missed the point] -- Mike Barnes Cheshire, England