Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Gassee joins the fray Date: 22 Jan 2015 17:24:53 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <1lyi997.xex7dh1r8ghuqN%nmassello@yahoo.com> <54c12ff8$0$19596$c3e8da3$b1356c67@news.astraweb.com> X-Trace: individual.net E4Qq4ajZyN1FcvlfjYxabAm+w7nQDfnRQcrhIBSr8TEY3Ncv85 Cancel-Lock: sha1:kTEk6S1vDAVWH34BTlR+m/kK5zs= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:68674 On 2015-01-22, JF Mezei wrote: > On 15-01-22 11:55, Jolly Roger wrote: > >> Apple announced the move to SMB way back in 2013 to developers during >> WWDC and in the Mavericks Core Technology Preview. > > At that time, wasn't it an announcement concerning a move to a new > version of SMB done by Apple (instead of open sourced product) ? > > As I recall, publicly, it was at Yosemite announcement in 2014 that > Apple announced it would now default to SMB, but STILL SUPPORT AFP. Perhaps, but the point is Apple *did* announce it to the world *before* making the change. If some folks didn't bother to listen, that's their problem. > This means that there is no reason for AFP to break, and AFP has not > been de-supported nor has a phase out been announced (although one can > see it coming in a few years depending on how Apple handles it). Supporting AFP doesn't mean AFP will be enabled by default. And since we don't know the details regarding how he was trying to connect to it, there's a lot of potential for fuckups on his end. > FYI, on my Yosemite laptop, AFP to cnnecrt to my XSERVE (Snow Leopard) > works just as it did with Snow Leopard. Same here. I just tried connecting to afp://server (which is my home server running Yosemite) and it worked fine, albeit a little slower than the default SMB connection. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR