Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: More Apple quality problems?
Date: 1 Jan 2015 16:05:15 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <cgl9hrFbba8U3@mid.individual.net>
References: <1lxhjur.mfkn0lxldmv6N%nmassello@yahoo.com> <cgidheFjmgoU1@mid.individual.net> <m810tq$imc$1@reader2.panix.com> <54a470c8$0$54714$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> <L9CdncHuL5sM6TnJnZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <54a47c9e$0$27591$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> <cgje1aFrc1nU4@mid.individual.net> <54a483d8$0$27494$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> <cgjhbsFrc1nU5@mid.individual.net> <54a4e56e$0$1547$c3e8da3$e408f015@news.astraweb.com>
X-Trace: individual.net MSRJWorneFNQrz8JNnNL/QJDG8qEdHeODmQ7Gl7jnbQP7s6dEA
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1kSeqKAXkBS/6d1mapIKvaJY4uo=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:68073

On 2015-01-01, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 14-12-31 19:06, Jolly Roger wrote:
>
>> Where did Tim Cook say that Mac Pro sales are very low? I'll wait for
>> your citation. Or are you lying yet again in another lame troll attempt?
>
> Look back at some of the links to interviews with Tim Cook I have posted
> over the last few months. He clearly stated it was a very low volume
> product but Apple was keeping it because it filled an important niche.

As far as I know the Mac Pro has never been a high volume product for
Apple. Did you have a point?

> Long delivery times don't mean much on their own because Apple may have
> set production capacity to be very low.

You've said that for years about various products as I recall, and you
were wrong then too.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR