Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Has Apple's software quality declined? Date: 23 Dec 2014 04:46:24 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <1lx21z9.hefq1nk0e3euN%nmassello@yahoo.com> <5498e6d0$0$32289$c3e8da3$cc4fe22d@news.astraweb.com> X-Trace: individual.net iwqYpsgljsTcS/2aCoRSlQblwYCr9GjcRwVZTTE8MgwdpiVeDD Cancel-Lock: sha1:uyHhG6T+vwGH5uPxT7hIIafq1oI= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:67769 On 2014-12-23, JF Mezei wrote: > On 14-12-22 17:50, Jolly Roger wrote: > >> You're conveniently ignoring all > > Irrespective of whether the actual number of serous problems is on the > increase or not Fail. The entire point of this thread and the article quoted is that there is an decrease in quality. You don't get to move the goal post now. A decrease in quality has not been established. What you call "blind love for anything Apple", I call simple logical analysis of facts. Again, I have yet to see anyone show proof that there is a decrease in quality. Nothing you can say short of providing evidence of a decline will change this fact. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR