Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Yosemite or how to make OSX look like iOS :( Date: 27 Jul 2014 18:14:20 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <53d53ab8$0$17073$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> X-Trace: individual.net G4yIERpvUbyDaMaeT53wUAOUdkaflT9onllondjCgx1JV2Ja12 Cancel-Lock: sha1:/qQOH/zSq40eevqM4Za/6+MnvUc= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:62498 On 2014-07-27, JF Mezei wrote: > On 14-07-26 16:06, Jolly Roger wrote: > >> People like you come out of the wood work any time Apple makes >> substantial, if glitzy, interface changes. Anyone who has been here a >> minute knows that for Apple, anything that isn't great will be refined >> over time. > > Unfortunatly, this is not the case. It is absolutely the case that Apple continually refines its user interfaces. Anyone claiming otherwise is either purposely lying or ignorant. > The design choice made by Apple on > UI are "religious" in nature and Apple doesn't go back on decisions. A simple web search shows lots of examples of Apple going back on user interface design decisions. One bright and shining example is how the Address Book application looked like a physical address book, and now no longer looks that way. You're lying, and doing a horrible job at it. > At best, they will tone down the UI design change. Either don't know the correct definition of "refined", or you're lying in an attempt to make a point. Either way, you lose; try again. > And this is what Apple is all about in UI. They rarely go back on a UI > decision. > > And that is a problem Lucky for us, your silly manufactured "problems" really don't matter much in the grand scheme of things. Keep trolling if it helps you sleep at night, though, trollboi. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR