Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Thumb-drive format Date: 22 Jul 2014 21:49:02 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <2014072212484624068-xxx@yyyzzz> X-Trace: individual.net SD9gDGg3PkAZGCwtam0/lgO6rDp/ZbKVNEx19dY7Dd+28TkgR6 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q/3nII2rt8/BgULXlTHHgzoADXs= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:62372 On 2014-07-22, gtr wrote: > I've been rooting around in desk drawers for my biggest thumb-drive > (16g), as I need it for some outboard gear. > > I note that it's format is MS-DOS(FAT32), and wonder if I should change > it to a mac-native or other format to ensure no universal access. Is > MSF32 the best option? > > Chances are it will likely be used by me alone, but one can never tell > about these things. Just a note: Simply formatting it with HFS+ will not ensure that others cannot read the data on it. If you are concerned with the security of the data on the thumb drive, then you should store an encrypted disk image on the drive, and store your data within that encrypted disk image. In this case, the format of the drive really doesn't matter much, since Mac OS X can access disk images on HFS+ and FAT with ease. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR