Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: OT: Looking for Remote WiFi Time-Lapse Camera
Date: 13 Jul 2014 15:26:02 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <c2fmoaFk51qU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <090720141944460673%star@sky.net> <100720140108386356%nospam@ny.more> <c26mqdFqnqhU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnlrsgav.1eer.g.kreme@Amelia.local> <c27ni9F97mU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnlrv42q.1g7k.g.kreme@Amelia.local> <c2a918Fg964U2@mid.individual.net> <slrnls09om.1ifu.g.kreme@Amelia.local> <c2aongFjnrvU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnls2jip.6kf.g.kreme@Amelia.local> <c2d3lnF3l97U1@mid.individual.net> <slrnls4e33.d1c.g.kreme@Amelia.local>
X-Trace: individual.net m1DWvQcSsua60CuIS9sjmwVrCOgfGPFAshHHx2pVYLuEp8Al+p
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MCxf16rWiaKXJwg6FKuNfkw5vcw=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:62187

On 2014-07-13, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>
>  Nor would I call a camera only on a LAN a "network" camera.

I'm sorry. I just have to say this has got to be the most idiotic
statement I've read in a day or so. If a camera is directly connected to
a WiFi or Ethernet LAN, it's a *network* camera by definition.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR