Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: android Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: 10.9 - disabling memory compression Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:58:38 +0200 Organization: the center of color Imaging for the color blind probono institute Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: individual.net 0dCftSvYSVOxDZLkiTk2CAD6d5PoV/qYORlaubu4TypRk0zqhL X-Orig-Path: here Cancel-Lock: sha1:lMtsUCRpppjyaSEoIqCTC47utwA= User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:58605 In article , Alan Browne wrote: > On 2014.04.17, 15:29 , android wrote: > > In article , > > Alan Browne wrote: > > > >> And yes, there is a gain by turning it off. Compression, even as cpu > >> efficient as the technique used, does use cpu cycles. > > > > Have you noticed it? Do you know what kind of compression it is? Is it > > merely defraging the ram or is it reusing file fragments? Your link suggest that it's the latter. > > Noticed it? Yes - there is no more compression indicated in the > memory monitor. > > Noticed it? No - I can't say the computer is any faster - but > that is of course subjective. > > Algorithm: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lempel%E2%80%93Ziv%E2%80%93Oberhumer -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography