Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Newsreaders Date: 10 Feb 2014 00:49:24 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <1srgsa-era1.ln1@news.chingola.ch> <090220141933138735%nospam@nospam.invalid> <090220141746064267%michelle@michelle.org> X-Trace: individual.net w8C5DC9zBuy48oOL/zS9ug1RfQzoT3evMiYUBzDI5Uk22hCC2j Cancel-Lock: sha1:fa+oO8zFdlRmWZrg7Wl9WOkuL+E= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:56321 On 2014-02-10, Michelle Steiner wrote: > In article <090220141933138735%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam > wrote: > >> > It is a myth. Find me one statement from Apple that says running Snow >> > Leopard client in a VM on Apple hardware violates the end user license >> > agreement. Such a statement does not exist. >> >> it's in the eula, plain as can be and quoted above, but here it is >> again: >> ...use and run one (1) copy of the Apple Software on a single >> Apple-branded computer at a time. >> >> claiming otherwise is nothing more than rationalization to get >> something for nothing. > > So if you have one copy of SL installed, and running under VM, you are > not in violation of that EULA. The key is the word "the"; the EULA is > for SL; therefore "the software" means SL. And that means you can be > running the VM under Mavericks, and not be in violation of the EULA. Of course. Only an idiot would try to argue otherwise. Cue mr.know-it-all... -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR