Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Newsreaders Date: 9 Feb 2014 23:08:24 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net v5sJHRUHzDWLI0fP9bQnBg0FHwQzxFkyTJdtszv3kpx1qSffaW Cancel-Lock: sha1:NOOlDPZ1YRr304ZDr5VPRUNTbyo= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:56307 On 2014-02-09, Laszlo Lebrun wrote: > On 09.02.2014 18:22, Doc O'Leary wrote: >> In article , >> Laszlo Lebrun wrote: >> >>> Why not using outlook express on windows 95 running on that VM base? >>> That should be approximately the same level of crap! >>> >>> Why the hell would you want to keep using a completely obsoleted >>> software that is neither maintained nor compliant? >> >> You might as well ask why everyone on Usenet doesn't just switch to web >> forums already. Because sometimes the old stuff wasn't broke, at least >> not bad enough compared to the "fixed" alternatives. Right now, Mac >> users have no good choices for Usenet readers, and that appears unlikely >> to change, so it should come as no surprise that they'll jump through a >> few hoops to get back something that works well. >> >> Put another way, if the "level of crap" to be found in running MacSOUP >> or slrn is *higher* than that of setting up a VM to run Windows, then it >> makes perfect sense that someone might prefer to run Outlook. The real >> message here is to the developers of newsreaders: your app is so bad >> that people will go to ^this^ extent to not use it. And it's clear by >> their inaction that they just do not care. >> > Works well? > įղժҽҽժ MT-WN ìʂ էհąէ çɾąքքվ էհąէ ìէ çąղ'է ҽѵҽղ ժҽąӀ աìէհ Աղìçօժҽ. mìղժ: > ìղ էհҽ 21ʂէ çҽղէմɾվ! God, you're boring. All you seem to care about it Unicode characters in news clients. Do you have a life outside of that? -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR