Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Any quick, easy way to compare two images?
Date: 26 Jan 2014 21:46:02 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <bkle0pFhddaU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <lbrnpr$q5o$1@dont-email.me> <xwlhy6jn6u.fsf@ethel.the.log> <2ridndio-M0kOnzPnZ2dnUVZ8kmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2fd2jijlbb.fsf@ethel.the.log> <Lcudnbvj4oa5JXzPnZ2dnUVZ8oOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <161tzyjibp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <5cKdnS2-vfr0cX_PnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ecfvocdh8s.fsf@ethel.the.log> <r_WdnVO3yP2VQn7PnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@giganews.com> <6jy523synp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <250120141345247892%nospam@nospam.invalid> <vey523eopt.fsf@ethel.the.log> <250120141630000472%nospam@nospam.invalid> <yxmwijeogq.fsf@ethel.the.log> <2014012515592033890-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <lc1opr$h1d$2@dont-email.me> <2014012517510124273-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <lc2hj5$loj$2@dont-email.me> <bkkopbFccv0U3@mid.individual.net> <eappned8cd.fsf@ethel.the.log> <rJCdnSHDVp3W3XjPnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <bkktomFdl1mU1@mid.individual.net> <52e571e7$0$22472$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com>
X-Trace: individual.net xlRcd/WC+bMnY1C45ga7IA0phBkvblIY8buV7IBmCvs0hRhIfK
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rXo+N6P5vMwap6ZsWOBfs7But4M=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:55456

On 2014-01-26, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 14-01-26 12:08, Jolly Roger wrote:
>
>> It's still not clear to me whether the so-called duplicate images are
>> distinct captures of the same scene, or whether they are in fact exact
>> duplicate images.
>
> Read again. It was made clear. He is affraid to process an image he has
> already processed.  Nothing to do with whether image+1 looks very much
> like image, but rather he doesn't want to process "image" twice.

Yeah, that's clear now. Thanks.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR