Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Any quick, easy way to compare two images?
Date: 26 Jan 2014 19:10:43 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <bkl4tiFf33uU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <lbrnpr$q5o$1@dont-email.me> <xwlhy6jn6u.fsf@ethel.the.log> <2ridndio-M0kOnzPnZ2dnUVZ8kmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2fd2jijlbb.fsf@ethel.the.log> <Lcudnbvj4oa5JXzPnZ2dnUVZ8oOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <161tzyjibp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <5cKdnS2-vfr0cX_PnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ecfvocdh8s.fsf@ethel.the.log> <r_WdnVO3yP2VQn7PnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@giganews.com> <6jy523synp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <250120141345247892%nospam@nospam.invalid> <vey523eopt.fsf@ethel.the.log> <250120141630000472%nospam@nospam.invalid> <yxmwijeogq.fsf@ethel.the.log> <2014012515592033890-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <lc1opr$h1d$2@dont-email.me> <2014012517510124273-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <lc2hj5$loj$2@dont-email.me> <bkkopbFccv0U3@mid.individual.net> <eappned8cd.fsf@ethel.the.log> <bkkrj5FdencU1@mid.individual.net> <i438kaaat1.fsf@ethel.the.log> <bkl1kdFejueU1@mid.individual.net> <cxr47uvazy.fsf@ethel.the.log>
X-Trace: individual.net YRpQe+5VUsDpaxNPhJA0dwem8l/TMezDKMBWnfAXhYpL2+QlX/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wM0F4mpHKwGsiJamnwpTutD56FU=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:55447

On 2014-01-26, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> On 2014-01-26, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My interpretation of "the same as" is that it means "identical."

Ok.

> You can certainly interpret it some other way if you like.

I wasn't sure how to interpret it.

> But regardless of how you choose to interpret it, the phrase "the same
> as" does not, in spite of your claim, "imply" something other than
> identical.

It was more a question of *what* was "identical" (the files, or just the
image content).

Anyhow, turns out you were right. Good on you. : ) 

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR