Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Any quick, easy way to compare two images?
Date: 26 Jan 2014 17:37:12 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <bkkve8Febc3U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <lbrnpr$q5o$1@dont-email.me> <xwlhy6jn6u.fsf@ethel.the.log> <2ridndio-M0kOnzPnZ2dnUVZ8kmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2fd2jijlbb.fsf@ethel.the.log> <Lcudnbvj4oa5JXzPnZ2dnUVZ8oOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <161tzyjibp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <5cKdnS2-vfr0cX_PnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ecfvocdh8s.fsf@ethel.the.log> <r_WdnVO3yP2VQn7PnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@giganews.com> <6jy523synp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <250120141345247892%nospam@nospam.invalid> <vey523eopt.fsf@ethel.the.log> <250120141630000472%nospam@nospam.invalid> <yxmwijeogq.fsf@ethel.the.log> <2014012515592033890-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <lc1opr$h1d$2@dont-email.me> <2014012517510124273-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <lc2hj5$loj$2@dont-email.me> <bkkopbFccv0U3@mid.individual.net> <eappned8cd.fsf@ethel.the.log> <rJCdnSHDVp3W3XjPnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <bkktomFdl1mU1@mid.individual.net> <9eWdnR39CsTl2HjPnZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Trace: individual.net c/5S2SK8wypU2bSkphMH7gsnzicHazjEtI/BylDopOAsje5AWt
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hdOmM4HVUo/tVwdBYVzxBJz7g8Y=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:55437

On 2014-01-26, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
> On 2014.01.26, 12:08 , Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2014-01-26, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>>> On 2014.01.26, 11:19 , Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>> (snip)
>>>>
>>>>> The reason we are still talking about this is you have not sufficiently
>>>>> articulate what you want.
>>>>
>>>> But he has.. The reason we are still talking about it is that some
>>>> people jumped to the wrong conclusion about what he wanted,
>>>
>>> Exactly.  He told us one thing but wanted something else and we jumped
>>> to the unfounded conclusion that he wanted what he asked for.
>>
>> It's still not clear to me whether the so-called duplicate images are
>> distinct captures of the same scene, or whether they are in fact exact
>> duplicate images.
>
> It's likely not clear to the OP either.

How can that be? All one need do is look...

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR