Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Any quick, easy way to compare two images?
Date: 26 Jan 2014 02:58:38 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <bkjbuuF3qa4U6@mid.individual.net>
References: <lbrnpr$q5o$1@dont-email.me> <xwlhy6jn6u.fsf@ethel.the.log> <2ridndio-M0kOnzPnZ2dnUVZ8kmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2fd2jijlbb.fsf@ethel.the.log> <Lcudnbvj4oa5JXzPnZ2dnUVZ8oOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <161tzyjibp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <5cKdnS2-vfr0cX_PnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ecfvocdh8s.fsf@ethel.the.log> <r_WdnVO3yP2VQn7PnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@giganews.com> <6jy523synp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <250120141345247892%nospam@nospam.invalid> <vey523eopt.fsf@ethel.the.log> <250120141630000472%nospam@nospam.invalid> <yxmwijeogq.fsf@ethel.the.log> <2014012515592033890-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <do_ray_me-A11CB7.12083926012014@news.albasani.net> <2014012517312260083-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <twwqhn3389.fsf@ethel.the.log>
X-Trace: individual.net 1jsbY3lAgPpa2Z7NBPiGaA2sFP+IR1+NV6JCCeKobV8HW4H3Lj
Cancel-Lock: sha1:p8i9nH0KKdf1z5osCrWvuYr845o=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:55399

On 2014-01-26, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> writes:
>
>> On 2014-01-26 01:08:41 +0000, dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> said:
>> 
>> > In article <2014012515592033890-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>> >  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Why worry if one frame appears visually identical
>> >> tthe one before it, or the one after, That does happen in
>> >> cinematography.
>> > Because the film might then be too long to view for some practical
>> > purposes?
>> 
>> Then one needs to ask what the purpose of this production might be?
>
> One doesn't really need to ask this.
>
> The OP asked a reasonable question.  It has reasonable answers.
>
> Presumably he has a reason for wanting to do what he wants to do.  Why
> is it important to tell him he shouldn't want to do it?

It's the only way jackasses who have an invalid position can defend that
position.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR