Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Date: 12 Jan 2014 05:16:23 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <1oqdnf9Iu-cmEFTPnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2014011113571021872-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <110120142310229365%timstreater@greenbee.net> <2014011115124598603-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> X-Trace: individual.net VoY1ta5FPbUfoNCoPelynQ+4M60OUX21L/bsn20JAye8zY88PL Cancel-Lock: sha1:+G2kOuQtYbBNZz3RXoDZ8pAKQHk= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:54613 On 2014-01-12, Lewis wrote: > > Reading the subject is usually way more than I am willing to do. If the > content is not clear from the body, I move on. Huh? Your statment doesn't make much sense to me. You act as if you can read a message without seeing the subject, which is certainly not the case if you are using slrn, since slrn (like most news clients) display a list of message subjects before you are allowed to see the bodies. Now, you may choose to ignore the subject, but you can't unsee it once you've seen it, and something tells me, whether you admit to it or not, that you don't read every single message that is posted in every news group without deciding first, based on the subjects, whether you want to read them or not. Or were you trying to say something different? -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR