Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Date: 12 Jan 2014 01:57:56 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <1oqdnf9Iu-cmEFTPnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2014011113571021872-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <110120142310229365%timstreater@greenbee.net> <2014011115124598603-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2014011117542311433-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> X-Trace: individual.net 1HX4GtyhKKiCS3pJkkSt0QfNHeU64GH2vGShgIQ9gN8NvQbHaD Cancel-Lock: sha1:ru08sSNkXBPRQ/KA7A3/RaetuKA= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:54600 On 2014-01-12, Savageduck wrote: > On 2014-01-12 00:28:22 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > >> I haven't seen anyone in this thread claim the problem is >> insurmountable; what we *are* saying is that exceedingly long subjects >> are inconvenient for those reading such posts. > > Agreed. > Sometimes it might just be a Usenet newcomer who needs help and you can > give him the benefit of doubt and provide the information requested. > However, this time it is "Ant" who has been posting to this NG since at > least 2007 with the same long narative subject lines. It is time he > learned that his actions are a PIA. Unfortunately, I haven't seen any indication from "Ant" that he understands or cares about this issue. : / -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR