Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.portables,comp.sys.mac.portable,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.system Date: 9 Jan 2014 19:14:11 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <1oqdnf9Iu-cmEFTPnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@earthlink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 9WxGNB9fGm0tgYoC4TpasgJUZ5u272+TIy7+nM2+4nd4c+VLqI Cancel-Lock: sha1:vjO5BAjgIeMa0wEBFwMubZJdRvk= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.portables:467 comp.sys.mac.system:54541 I've noticed you seem to make a habit of filling every possible character available in subject lines. Perhaps you are unaware that using such long subjects makes reading your messages more difficult for others, because a lot of news / email clients truncate long subjects for display, forcing readers to scroll or widen windows to read the entire thing. Note that this typically happens *before* they have had a chance to decide whether they actually *want* to read your message. The subject field is meant to be a short synopsis of the message contents - the purpose of which is to give the reader a good idea of what the message is about, so that they can more accurately decide whether further reading is desireable for them. It's best to use just a handful of words, typed properly, that accurately indicate the message content – and nothing more. Supplying concise, accurate subjects is simply good etiquette. You should reconsider your position on this, IMO. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR