Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: External HD Recommendation
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:54:17 -0600
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <bie1b9Fdib8U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <281220130921464151%otto@bogus.address.com> <l9nbrf$qqu$1@reader2.panix.com> <vilain-E2F745.14592728122013@news.individual.net> <slrnlc1u6b.c4g.g.kreme@amelia.local> <291220132136524546%otto@bogus.address.com> <l9sb0f$98l$1@reader1.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net cT0Wk94xHBvbGc3A8WefAQmc57JRDSoXBIzfvZN/b6elD72h1n
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eFOOlplKBG+XKyHtEuX/W10Zliw=
User-Agent: Unison/2.1.10
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:54082

On 2013-12-30 17:37:19 +0000, Bread said:

> The thing is that the SuperDuper clones require more intervention on my 
> part and
> the least reliable part of my backup system/workflow is *me*.  Crashplan and
> Time Machine just happen.

I'm puzzled by the statement that SuperDuper! clones require more 
intervention. I have two SuperDuper! clones produced automatically in 
the middle of the night and no intervention on my part is required.

-- 
James Leo Ryan - Austin, Texas