Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Newsreaders =?UTF-8?Q?=21=C2=A1=21?= Date: 4 Nov 2013 01:13:24 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: <291020131010406196%Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> <1lbkqbf.14r6lsg19nu7j9N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <1lbll8q.sm5jc4p4e5ecN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <1lblws8.8epkxihf8otuN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <1lbmhib.15zjg4s1ib1d4vN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <1lbml3j.1hc6k8z1gydbx6N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <1lbrd63.1rcrp9e1clkpbbN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <1lbrnq1.15xgsj1n3c1kxN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 4pLHmGLlHmvXD02KaHrICQMn7hgtKpA85+umiqjOeSYtwR9JWK Cancel-Lock: sha1:5BS2TRGD7QfAK1JfFWV09Ok3iNU= User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:51814 On 2013-11-03, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > Jolly Roger wrote: > >> On 2013-11-02, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: >> > Jolly Roger wrote: >> > >> >> I'm using slrn. How can I tell if it's configured to handle UTF-8 >> >> correctly? >> > >> > From your headers: "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8". So slrn at >> > least thinks it's encoding your posts with UTF-8, and I'm fairly certain >> > that is in fact the case :-) Try posting some of the expanded charset. >> >> ¡™£¢∞§¶•ªº >> >> Yuck. I was expecting to see something more like this: >> >> >> >> Wonder what's wrong... > > That is what I see in MacSOUP. Are you saying you don't see that in your > own post in slrn? Well, search me *shrug* I've only ever used tin in > recent memory when it comes to command line Usenet clients. You're the > expert here compared to me, JR! :-) Nope, I see: I bet you it's the font I'm using in Terminal. I'm going to try switching to something more mainstream to see if that changes things. > Either way, I mean who really uses the full charset of Unicode in > Usenet? I think it's just one or two rabid Unicode fans (that someone > can be that much of a fan of character encodings bothers even someone as > geeky as me...) stirring the pot, here. It's more of an irritation to me, because it means I won;t be able to read some posts. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR