Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com!not-for-mail Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:54:19 -0700 (Seattle) Message-ID: References: <8cf406ebded79d41387435aaa9ed7e93@hoi-polloi.org> <2015060410052834327-xxx@yyyzzz> <040620151201386113%michelle@michelle.org> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server,alt.comp.os.linux Subject: Would a "carbon tax" would benefit the poor ?! User-Agent: Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP X-Complaints-To: abuse@blueworldhosting.com Organization: BWH Usenet NNTPSwitch-Cluster Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:54:18 -0400 X-Trace: c81dc5570bafaec90b8a612614 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:297697 comp.sys.mac.system:76133 Speaking of human·induced global warming, Michelle·Steiner wrote: > Rick Santorum said that the Pope should leave science to scientists > (with regards to global climate change). > There are two problems with this: > > 1. Something like 95% of scientists who have > any expertise in the subject say that > humanity is a major contributor to global climate change. > > 2. The Pope is a scientist; he has a Masters degree in chemistry. Would a "carbon tax" would benefit the poor ?! Currently, there are about USD $550 billion in fossil fuel subsidies annually, worldwide.