X-Received: by 10.224.13.12 with SMTP id z12mr15702731qaz.7.1398777346207; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cm18no7262267qab.0!news-out.google.com!dz10ni26594qab.1!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:15:46 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:15:43 -0500 Subject: Re: Apple (AAPL) stock split From: George Kerby Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system,misc.phone.mobile.iphone Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Apple (AAPL) stock split Thread-Index: Ac9jrR+8j2i0P+BF6kqK5AI5pTfH9A== References: <53586f13$0$7147$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com> <535c4c66$0$10359$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com> <535c6396$0$10302$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com> <535d6a6f$0$49677$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Lines: 34 X-Trace: sv3-KH5k8J/LIcbzn2wszt7vKlCQAuB2EjyFYSgKa7SZSEi7vVdwzJnTqhv+6N/7l/I8T6llc9d6WWU1YU8!iKB9tFFSlfM0jPHRbtALhxpasL4/W9SiYgIoMIGV3UzaLmgmtpbLIIYMZR8PVkYQFeuZo1IYJXyD!Vg== X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2774 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Received-Bytes: 3080 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1067671063 Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:59010 On 4/27/14 4:07 PM, in article kasql9t5bg1t327qiheu2anug6trdbbco0@4ax.com, "bknight@conramp.net" wrote: > On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 16:54:52 -0400, Alan Browne > wrote: > >> On 2014.04.27, 16:37 , JF Mezei wrote: >>> On 14-04-27 10:53, Alan Browne wrote: >>> >>>> Just do some research - it will be clear enough. >>>> >>> >>> >>> So you are accusing me of being clueless, and you are unable to provide >>> a single correction to my statement on the Google stock split. >>> >>> I did some research as I own some GOOG (and now also GOOGL) and of >>> course wanted to know what the implications were. And if you are unable >>> to point me to where my research was in error, how can I knew where I >>> allegedly erred ? >> >> If you did any real research, it would be as clear as spring water. > > Generally when this kind of response is given it means that one > doesn't have the answer. > > If it was that clear why in hell don't you just tell us? You don't really know Brownie do you? He is the king of ambiguity and is ALWAYS right - in his own mind, that is...