Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michelle Steiner Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad Subject: Re: 29 Years Ago: The Flop that keeps on Flopping Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:12:50 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <221120131612501688%foo@bar.com> References: <211120130908287416%YourName@YourISP.com> <870820284406691443.013702recliner2-news-yahoo.co.uk@news.btinternet.com> <211120131908517278%YourName@YourISP.com> <2013112115215727544-me@foonet> <221120131134470694%foo@bar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8b819003531285591ae70ba618133493"; logging-data="28158"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NSXbclF6CphOMjdeNKUAE3+Zo9bODPaQ=" User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.1 (Mac OS X) Cancel-Lock: sha1:GYcSRjYw1Pyo44/TFwwhIcHBQgw= Mail-Copies-To: nobody Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:52520 comp.mobile.ipad:29226 In article , Bill Findlay wrote: > On 22/11/2013 18:34, in article 221120131134470694%foo@bar.com, "Michelle > Steiner" wrote: > > > In article , Bill Findlay > > wrote: > > > >> On 22/11/2013 01:34, in article l6mcbe$5f9$1@dont-email.me, "Wes Groleau" > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Guidelines for judging others: > >>> 1. Don't attribute to malice that which > >>> can be adequately explained by stupidity. > >>> 2. Don't attribute to stupidity that which > >>> can be adequately explained by ignorance. > >>> 3. Don't attribute to ignorance that which > >>> can be adequately explained by misunderstanding. > >>> 4. Don't attribute to misunderstanding that which > >>> can be adequately explained by alcohol. > >> > >> 5. Don't attribute to alcohol that which > >> can be adequately explained by religion. > > > > 6. Don't attribute to religion that which > > can be adequately explained by political > > dogmatism masquerading as religion. > > There is a difference? Indeed there is.