Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm Subject: Re: Newsreaders Date: 20 Apr 2015 18:53:22 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <0001HW.1AC73E2600A715E11090593CF@news.eternal-september.org> <290320151440240692%michelle@michelle.org> <290320152138124816%michelle@michelle.org> <300320150830152325%michelle@michelle.org> <010420150939071272%michelle@michelle.org> <1m36p7h.11f79z8a0gzgrN@marc.my-fqdn.de> X-Trace: individual.net kEltqRJWWxPLhJTkCA+oVgPrZx9CNpXF0C7ABcl1zVxJnUUOgo Cancel-Lock: sha1:mvcTy/nYuYrfAEr+5g54ZZjf67M= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.comm:2723 On 2015-04-20, Marc Stibane wrote: > Michelle Steiner wrote: >> Howard S Shubs wrote: >>> On 2015-03-31, D.F. Manno wrote: > >>>> There are reasons they scrapped OS 9 and started from scratch on X. >>> Yes, because they bought NeXT, adopted that OS, and renamed it. >> That is the major reason they bought NeXT, so they could scrap Mac OS 9 >> and start from scratch. > > And there was nothing wrong with that - because of "Classic", a > compatibility layer that allowed you to execute MacOS 9 applications on > OS X. > > This was a nice working software, and I really don't understand why > Apple ever stopped supporting it. They should even have ported it to > Intel IMO - would have gotten them a few more hardware sales. It probably became too costly (and not just monetarily) to continue supporting Classic in OS X. If I need to run classic versions of Mac OS, I use SheepShaver or Basilisk II. You can also get 10.6 up and running in VirtualBox to use Classic if desired. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR