Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm Subject: Re: Newsreaders Date: 1 Apr 2015 17:51:15 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <0001HW.1AC73E2600A715E11090593CF@news.eternal-september.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net gxhRLRmS0Nu+N/vfWmFCTw7OaKEqBI8yQpGWujq/FUyHekWYut Cancel-Lock: sha1:nI42fGTPFolXF/VJOv+4rvmrT9A= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.comm:2701 On 2015-04-01, Doc O'Leary wrote: > For your reference, records indicate that > Tim McNamara wrote: > >> Linux will never be a widespread user-side OS. It's just too hard to >> use. 99% of the compuer using public wants an appliance that they can >> turn on, use, and turn off once they're done. > > If the Mac could do it (well, really, it was NeXT that mainly did it), > so could Linux. Uh huh. Then why hasn't Linux done it? It's only been, what, 15 years so far. >> One of the biggest holdups for Linux is that many of not most >> distributions are obsessed with licensing issues (GPL 2 vs 3, etc.) and >> they will use crappy-but-free-as-in-speech applications preferentially >> to applications that actually work but have more restrictive licensing. > > Plus the insular developer mindset. For example, GNUstep use should have > taken off when iOS turned out to be a hit, but they seem to have absolutely > no desire to work with anyone who wants to port to/from Apple platforms. Cry me a river. > Steering this back to newsreaders, it’s why all these different command > line readers you’re stuck with can’t *bear* to either develop or use > a common NNTP library to do the meat of what they do. Usenet might not > be in such a sad state if there hadn’t been so much wasted effort. And those of us using command-line news clients aren't bitching about it nearly as much as you. Go figure. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR