Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!MIX!Blackbird From: billy@MIX.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Local Mail Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: panix5.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1390888693 29935 166.84.1.5 (28 Jan 2014 05:58:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:20780 Lewis writes: > I've been adminning mail servers continuously since 1993. An odd statement from one posting news articles with a gmail address. > In fact, port 465 is defined as a SSM port, not a port having > anything to do with mail. > > /etc/services > igmpv3lite 465/udp # IGMP over UDP for SSM > urd 465/tcp # URL Rendesvous Directory for SSM $ uname -v NetBSD 6.1 (PANIX-XEN-USER) #1: Fri Aug 2 19:22:23 EDT 2013 $ grep 465 /etc/services smtps 465/tcp # smtp protocol over TLS/SSL (was ssmtp) > Use of port 465 was deprecated well over a decade ago in favor of > STARTTLS on the submission port (read RFC 3207 for details on this). I'm talking about what works, not what should work. Billy Y.. -- sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer bcc 20$ ; not a number