Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Apple Watch Date: 11 Apr 2015 22:22:50 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <100420152235080311%michelle@michelle.org> <110420151418107543%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Trace: individual.net 28aseCr4VC4tu0Lvvf5jFwGyz/HXNJ6ERSM/adcOVDlM7aZfx3 Cancel-Lock: sha1:kqOipKFleKGmNmWP4jZKWNj1xYY= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:28742 On 2015-04-11, AV3 wrote: > On 4/11/15, 14:18, nospam wrote: > >> do you really think they're intentionally delaying the gold edition? > > No, but I thought they would have highest priority for delivery. What evidence can you provide that shows they don't? > I doubt Apple expects to sell a thousand during the next year. > Couldn't they have a couple of hundred ready by the earliest delivery > date? Perhaps not economically. Why does it matter so much to you? > I would expect that kind of priority if I were spending that much > money for a watch case. And you clearly speak for yourself. I'm sure plenty are happy to get it when its first available. > Maybe demand far outpaced Apple's expectations. Or maybe your suggestion that they don't have the highest priority for delivery is incorrect. > I expect I got a relatively early delivery date promised because I > ordered a relatively expensive model that is less in demand. Yes. And so what? -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR