Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Aperture ? Date: 28 Mar 2015 14:25:52 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <250320151230447827%nospam@nospam.invalid> <2015032619172752791-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> X-Trace: individual.net 0RBbRr4u2WKj3122EHu1OQIQOyim85jDRVOnFBt9ol0mYwiHcV Cancel-Lock: sha1:aXu1xTn4f1t2hqEk1oWZK2A0gkM= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:28462 On 2015-03-28, tmo1138 wrote: > On 2015-03-27, Savageduck wrote: >> On 2015-03-27 01:58:50 +0000, tmo1138 said: >> >>> On 2015-03-25, Huge wrote: >>>> >>>>> How do people feel about darktable? >>>> >>>> I'd be interested to know, too, because I'm still looking for a decent >>>> management tool. GIMP satisfies all my editing needs. >>>> >>>> You could add Digikam to the list, too, if you're going Open Source. >>> >>> For what I do I tried the same things in GIMP and Photoshop. Photoshop was far >>> better at the exact same tasks. So much so that I don't consider paying to use >>> Photoshop (or Lightroom) a wasted expense. >> >> Ta! Dah!! >> I think that applies to all of us allegedly being exploited by Adobe. > > I think it boils down to choices. Personally I have no problem with paying the > 10 bucks a month.. but I can understand why others would. It's good that you can see both sides of the equation without being so dedicated to one or the other that you dismiss those who choose one or the other. Others here seem to be unable to achieve that position, for whatever reason. Good on you. : ) -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR