Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Safari - Google search deal expires soon.  New default for Safari ...
Date: 4 Feb 2015 12:52:16 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <cjej00Fth45U3@mid.individual.net>
References: <NLOdnQCjQLGM3lPJnZ2dnUU7-SGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <010220151401050621%invid@loclanet.com> <201502011528166493-xxx@yyyzzz> <h6ttcato8svdn1blvogj2ju1fj9gvvvmro@4ax.com> <cj8c83Fai2lU1@mid.individual.net> <barmar-90616D.11590402022015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <slrnmd00c0.1sbd.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> <020220152024274000%michelle@michelle.org> <030220150932518483%nospam@nospam.invalid> <030220150958367701%michelle@michelle.org> <040220150048194122%nospam@nospam.invalid> <030220152334476105%michelle@michelle.org>
X-Trace: individual.net 3r2eFhbmYeVsJNLWzkNjMQi6Jenj+gx9kOcKLCSGKAuPqnAKqV
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kuN31OVMZsHgtGp4J0T9pDm+WLM=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:27672

On 2015-02-04, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> In article <040220150048194122%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam
><nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> > Android is one of Google's ways to increase its advertising revenues. 
>> > Therefore, it is in competition with iOS.
>> 
>> nope.
>> 
>> apple doesn't make money on advertising, other than a small amount from
>> iads.
>> 
>> two totally different business models.
>
> Business models don't count.  The fact is that for every Android phone
> sold, Apple loses an iPhone sale.

No, that's definitely not true. Android is used on many crappy, cheap
phones that don't even make up the market segments in which Apple
competes.

> Therefore, they're in competition. 

Somewhat. To a large extent, no.

> You can rationalize against that forever, but you can't change the
> facts, no matter how much you deny them.

The "fact" you stated above is erroneous.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR