Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Upcoming New Newsreader for the Mac: Signal Date: 14 Jun 2014 15:17:57 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <9eWdnVQgKbylfg3OnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <110620140934273352%michelle@michelle.org> <0ZWdnTjR9K4q2QfOnZ2dnUVZ_vEAAAAA@giganews.com> <1ln8dss.x7ctmsxcilz7N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <1ln8kr4.1xylof119q3onyN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <1ln8xbv.h4vpwr1id4a5bN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> X-Trace: individual.net 9SBeaconDr6dZpWW94/3YwLXFxswSst1nTe9cC6Jw3saf/Aald Cancel-Lock: sha1:oXEu0XLQS1CunZa3WvMbjSArfps= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:22884 comp.sys.mac.system:60915 On 2014-06-14, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > Jolly Roger wrote: > >> On 2014-06-14, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: >> > Jolly Roger wrote: >> > >> >> On 2014-06-14, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > [snip] >> >> > I think it's clear Doc already has 'skin in the game' (horrible saying >> >> > IMO - ugg :-D ) given he's posting here using the software he's working >> >> > on. But he's too focused on monetary compensation (1) for Signal to ever >> >> > see the light of day, IMO. That's the real problem - not Alan's trollish >> >> > focus on Doc's marketing, and trying to pick largely meaningless points >> >> > in what he's said. >> >> >> >> Strongly disagree. There is no problem. The only "problem" I see here is >> >> the one folks like you and Alan are trying to manufacture. >> > >> > You really think this venture had a snowball's chance in hell (I guess >> > I'm through sugarcoating it, heh) of succeeding? >> >> Whether I think it will succeed is irrelevant. Same goes for you. Same >> goes for Alan. And words of discouragement aren't needed either. > > Fair enough, though I'd say he solicited opinion here, and mine was > given. It clearly wasn't terribly welcome, but oh well. Things also got > a wee bit testy there towards the end of this thread. No worries. I'd > just like to see a project to make a new really good Mac Usenet client > actually succeed, and this one is set up to fail IMO, which is a damn > shame, regardless of my own preferences for a Usenet client :-) I'll just submit that, in the end, whether it will fail or not is purely in the hands of one person - the author. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR