Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Upcoming New Newsreader for the Mac: Signal
Date: 12 Jun 2014 02:34:40 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <bvshtvF9fvaU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <lmi170$v2m$1@dont-email.me> <i_CdndYZoviRfRHOnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <bv49nnF7ameU1@mid.individual.net> <lmkug8$4e9$2@dont-email.me> <barmar-A6DAC0.12564403062014@news.eternal-september.org> <slrnlos8r5.am0.g.kreme@amelia.local> <lmngnp$i0l$4@dont-email.me> <do_ray_me-C2133E.08364105062014@aioe.org> <9eWdnVQgKbylfg3OnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <lmsonp$ilo$5@dont-email.me> <w-GdnccPnqdQmQ7OnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <lmveq4$3fd$1@dont-email.me> <bvif9jF64mdU1@mid.individual.net> <bvjti7FfjjaU1@mid.individual.net> <DOqdnd-mrp3s9ArOnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <bvpfcfFkl8iU2@mid.individual.net> <G6CdnXYz36SwUQXOnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@giganews.com> <110620142311143475%timstreater@greenbee.net>
X-Trace: individual.net 5VzV2zzNxu1ZkX4qdn+dWQvoertnmQXOoq0caQNHOq0glZrDNk
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tlURGUeifGLR40qbuc0RjI+6JHM=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:22805 comp.sys.mac.system:60826

On 2014-06-11, Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote:
> In article <G6CdnXYz36SwUQXOnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
><alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>> Again (this is tedious) it's not the "what" but the claims and the 0/100 
>> risk/reward model that irks me.
>
> You really are a clueless twerp, aren't you. He's asking to be paid to
> do some development. If not enough people here agree that the
> development is required, not only does it not get done, but no-one is
> out a penny. If enough people do agree, then the development does get
> done, and he gets paid for it. What is so bizarre about that so that
> you and a few other loonies have got ants in your pants about it?

Nothing better to do, obviously...

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR