Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: Upcoming New Newsreader for the Mac: Signal
Date: 8 Jun 2014 04:38:39 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <bvi7mfF48ubU6@mid.individual.net>
References: <lmi170$v2m$1@dont-email.me> <i_CdndYZoviRfRHOnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <bv49nnF7ameU1@mid.individual.net> <lmkrg0$o4h$3@reader2.panix.com> <1lmqa29.k4rshchnvytzN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <VaydndBlF7PtEw3OnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <zOmdnRjcH-LGcw3OnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <zOmdnRvcH-Ihcw3OnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnlp28tf.1isd.g.kreme@Amelia.local> <Hc2dnQMg3_N6tQ_OnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnlp4ljq.dfr.timmcn@sugaree.local> <LrydnUwBzpI0xg_OnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@giganews.com> <bvfce2FgllqU2@mid.individual.net> <27idnRJKcuU6Yw_OnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@giganews.com> <bvggb0FoipmU1@mid.individual.net> <bZadnbyLXN9zvw7OnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@giganews.com> <bvgni1Fq207U1@mid.individual.net> <do_ray_me-F667A0.10361008062014@aioe.org> <bvi55fF48ubU1@mid.individual.net> <do_ray_me-11CBF7.14254408062014@aioe.org>
X-Trace: individual.net iuqV+cyUn2r6rMUC1pZvDQRZ3QEdXsBSyqR0W5W3MzZt5wt8JF
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I/7Q4iE61+jsLcRAEhTU4ZegZLo=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:22474

On 2014-06-08, dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> wrote:
> In article <bvi55fF48ubU1@mid.individual.net>,
>  Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>  
>> Merely quoting someone confirms their right to bitch? Not sure I follow
>> that logic; but whatever floats your little leaf.
>> 
>> > - unnecessarily at such length as 
>> > far as anyone else is concerned - to try to rebut his concerns.
>
> You do not need to quote him at such length. There is no other logic 
> involved that need concern you.
>
>> ... your claim that my posts are unnecessary is the polar opposite
>> of your statement that Browne has the right to air his irritations.
>> Apparently you would like to apply a double standard here.
>
> Slow down. No one is saying your posts are unnecessary. There is no 
> double standard.

My bad, I misunderstood. You're right. I could trim more - I get lazy
sometimes. I'll try to do better. I do respect others who have respect
for good etiquette.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR