Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Upcoming New Newsreader for the Mac: Signal Date: 8 Jun 2014 03:55:27 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 45 Message-ID: References: <1lmqa29.k4rshchnvytzN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <27idnRJKcuU6Yw_OnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@giganews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net bl9aHpRYMNz5UNcRUFB6VAu7ZHHA90MUbwouB2aNnt7jjpQghY Cancel-Lock: sha1:tjjsT+VEKNRcWVLUOPHx5lA3Sy0= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:22463 On 2014-06-08, dorayme wrote: > In article , > Paul Förster wrote: > >> Hi Alan, >> >> On 2014-06-07 14:34:21 +0000, Alan Browne said: >> > I haven't used it but it seems every time it is mentioned in the >> > iphone/ipad groups it's roundly criticized. For that reason I >> > mentioned that the OP might be induced to focus there. >> >> what about checking it out for yourself before critisizing? >> >> As for Signal, I don't see your point. If you don't like it, or the >> idea, or the amount, or whatever, then don't support it. It's just that >> easy. If the OP manages to get the money he wants/needs, then good for >> him. What the heck is the problem there? > > It is a very human problem. Browne is *irritated* by what is proposed > and he has every right to air his irritations. Just as anyone else has a right to respond to his rants. > That right is confirmed every time Jolly Old Rog quotes him Merely quoting someone confirms their right to bitch? Not sure I follow that logic; but whatever floats your little leaf. > - unnecessarily at such length as > far as anyone else is concerned - to try to rebut his concerns. He's being disingenuous and rather rude, as far as I'm concerned. And he's demonstrating either willful ignorance, or an incapability to understand and acknowledge basic software development realities, instead choosing go so far as to accuse someone he has likely never met or gotten to know well of being dishonest. I have the right to object to that. And your claim that my posts are unnecessary is the polar opposite of your statement that Browne has the right to air his irritations. Apparently you would like to apply a double standard here. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR