Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Mail app and junk Date: 25 Feb 2014 21:21:46 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 55 Message-ID: References: <1lhm6yf.a2qb914ggcgyN%pfj@doesn't.exist.com> <1lhm79c.1wn5hre1ffxdsN%pfj@doesn't.exist.com> <1lhn4yf.lnu50oy31x4wN%pfj@doesn't.exist.com> X-Trace: individual.net MUyCLl/E+KM0vQn7hauBlgNlhzhdIly3HoOjGUOtA3pSex7fG8 Cancel-Lock: sha1:6wMdM03WpMoJp8XoVABH+Z0CbEA= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:21214 On 2014-02-25, Peter James wrote: > Jolly Roger wrote: > >> On 2014-02-25, Peter James wrote: >> > Peter James wrote: >> > >> >> I seem to be getting a lot of email with headings similar to: >> >> >> >> ****SPAM:14.5**** >> >> The "****SPAM:14.5****" text is not being added by Apple Mail. So you or >> your email provider must be using a spam facility that is adding that. > I checked the raw header of the message and found the following, > inserted by my provider. > [snip] > > X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system > "j.spamless.aa.net.uk", has processed this message and it scored (5.6 > points). > pts rule name description > X-Spam-Flag: YES > Subject: ****SPAM:5.6**** Sonomed Ultrasound Offers [snip] Someone upstream from you (probably your email provider) is using this service to mark spam for you. You'll need to contact them if you want them to change the way spam messages are marked or treated. > I have two rules that I thought would delete these messages unread, and > they read: > > Any message that contains SPAM delete Do you mean "any message whose *subject* contains "SPAM"? If so, this rule should get triggered when this message is encountered in your Inbox. > and > Any message that contains ****SPAM?**** delete > > I seem to remember reading that the ? symbol in these circumstances > would be read as any symbol or number. Or am I wrong here? No, I haven't ever seen the "?" character used in Mail rules. I just did a test and the "?" character seems to be taken literally - in other words only a subject with "****SPAM?***" would match. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR