Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Replacement for Lineform? Date: 22 Feb 2014 20:45:46 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <2014022201052424437-notmyemail@invalidemailcom> <201402221202389136-notmyemail@invalidemailcom> X-Trace: individual.net stdLhsBo2UOlIXrUHhLNZwBfoj/287oiNdtCPrKAXG15EX5pvE Cancel-Lock: sha1:hVwFdlokKTtNmRwK6SnE5M8K5RA= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:21183 On 2014-02-22, Mirsky wrote: > On 2014-02-22 16:37:03 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > >> I see that Intaglio (among others) is listed as an alternative to >> Lineforms on MacUpdate: > > Yeah, I own an older version that I got in software bundle probanly > five or six years ago. It doesn't support a graphics tablet and it > allows for uniform stroke widths. And the newer version doesn't either; > I've checked. Ah, okay, Worth a shot! -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR