Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: How do I get the google window back in Safari? Date: 19 Jan 2014 04:17:39 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: individual.net f5W491h99E3U7bbccBWjmQ+1+21k3Vgnzq53klAuVZvc/cSBmu Cancel-Lock: sha1:xUIrQPx4Esj705u2JrV1F4Ble4k= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:20505 On 2014-01-19, Erilar wrote: > Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2014-01-18, Erilar wrote: >>> Ted Lee wrote: >>>> On 1/17/14, 10:50 AM, David Downing wrote: >>>>> I just installed Mavericks and the new version of Safari seems to not >>>>> have one feature the previous one did -- the search field in the upper >>>>> right of the browser screen that lets you search google. Is this gone >>>>> now or is there a way to get it back? >>>> >>>> The search field has been combined with the URL field. If you put >>>> in what looks like a URL, it will try to open that. If you put in >>>> anything else it will do a search. (There's a pick-list in the >>>> Safari general preferences to select among Google, Yahoo, or Bing >>>> as the default search engine.) If you put quotes around a URL you >>>> enter in that field, it'll search for that rather than open it. I >>>> like this new feature, except when I use another machine that >>>> hasn't been updated and find myself entering a search term into the >>>> URL field. >>>> >>> That really sounds like another downgrade to me! >> >> Can you explain you think so? > > Every "simplification" or "improvement" I see described about this system > strikes me as taking control away from the user, as has been happening in > both software and hardware. Instead of allowing choces or being able to > control settings on a sliding scale, we are now dumped into discrete slots > that allow of little to no variance. Plrase explain to me how this is an > advantage for any but the hapless. What is it about this particular change that you consider a step backward? -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR