Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Spelling Checker in Mail.app Date: 2 Jan 2014 02:32:06 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <52c453e3$0$52739$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> X-Trace: individual.net BnlBztknPRyxWUXvveEOXQGPeGAbqj7nDsM3LRRkf9v1xdM9BR Cancel-Lock: sha1:MgavupgtP1Rd8cwJqvjpN9eWvdw= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:20312 On 2014-01-02, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article , > Jolly Roger wrote: > >> On 2014-01-02, Barry Margolin wrote: >> > In article <52c453e3$0$52739$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, >> > Patty Winter wrote: >> > >> >> In article , >> >> Matthew Lybanon wrote: >> >> > >> >> >I understand that it probably just looks like one continuous block of >> >> >text to the spelling checker. But does anybody know of some secret >> >> >flag, or something, that can tell the spelling checker to restrict its >> >> >search to only the text that I type? >> >> >> >> What is the problem with it checking quoted text? Does it slow down >> >> the spellchecking? Do the underlined words annoy you? Something else? >> > >> > If you're not going to correct the errors (would you?), what's the point >> > of marking them? >> >> I don't see the problem. Are you unable to ignore them? > > I almost never use spell checkers. One of the reasons is that I find > those red squigglies really annoying. My communication is full of lots > of abbreviations and technical jargon that isn't in the dictionaries. > Yes, I know you can update them, but it's a PITA. So turn it off. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR