Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: android Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Keeping out Big Brother? Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:50:58 +0100 Organization: thecenter Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <301020131823357894%star@sky.net> X-Trace: individual.net +wk48XyoZHgH4HRJpBJPYASWsSesPAGiwtYo/gTnLz63CIGpSJ X-Orig-Path: here Cancel-Lock: sha1:dO+TCncd2uotp2l2oPeL9CYJCVE= User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X) X-No-Archive: Yes Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:19126 In article , Wes Groleau wrote: > On 10-31-2013, 02:42, android wrote: > > Lewis wrote: > >> Wes Groleau wrote: > >>> "Unseen" claims to believe that NSA is able to decrypt most of the 'net > >>> traffic now, > >> > >> Oh, well, net-traffic. Yeah. They evidently have copies of all the SSL > >> keys they want to have and intercept all the unencrypted traffic to > >> boot. > > > > Unless the site generate their keys themselves. Then, of course, the > > visitor gets a weird semierror message in their browser. Time to > > breakout that tinfoil? > > If you want to argue for or against their position, read it first. I was referring to that the NSA would have access to all private SSL keys. Of course they could hack those sites like any petty criminal but I think that that Lewis was that some CAs might help them out. The reply was directed to Lewis not you. :-p > Otherwise you're playing the strawman game. > > http://blog.unseen.is/2013/06/15/is-most-encryption-broken/ > That's no game site... > > > Or that biiig family secret might leak into the White House... > > Sorry, we have no room for any more secrets. Thank you for trying. Sorry Mr. P. I didn't know that. Do you want me to send the "cleaners"? -- teleportation kills