Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "David B." Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,uk.comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:45:19 +0100 Lines: 54 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: boaterdave@hotmail.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net jQ/UkDvBZb8uFH34TAfOigbBmX6A4k0uoKF8gC53Wa0MsP8VSB Cancel-Lock: sha1:napMFv8h8qz8L8bN2caEemWs5a4= sha256:tRUB9XCmDmKjunOppYk18wiceV9bNs9I+ahr9WJ6u0E= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.advocacy:136526 uk.comp.sys.mac:181677 On 13/08/2025 22:16, Tyrone wrote: > On Aug 8, 2025 at 2:13:18 PM EDT, ""David B."" wrote: > >> On 08/08/2025 18:21, Gremlin wrote: >>> "David B." news:mfm1aeFqc46U1@mid.individual.net Fri, >>> 08 Aug 2025 10:19:58 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/08/2025 06:58, Gremlin wrote: >>>>> "David B." news:mfe8q5Fh1j1U1@mid.individual.net >>>>> Tue, 05 Aug 2025 11:38:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>>>> >>>>> This has already been resolved. There is no malware present in the >>>>> software. You have already confirmed that you continue to infer that's >>>>> not the case because the author will not engage with you. You are once >>>>> again, knowingly dishonestly, sliming the product. >>>> >>>> Perhaps you will categorically confirm that once one has given EtreCheck >>>> "Full Disk Access" one has *NOT* left an open backdoor? >>> >>> This nonsense has already been covered as well. I asked you several times >>> why you didn't apply the same standards to a variety of other software >>> companies who's software does the same thing. Including Apple. You danced >>> around my question and finally responded with the reason, because the author >>> won't correspond with you. That's never going to be a satisifactory answer >>> for your implications and wrongful accusations that you continue to make >>> against the software. >>> >>> Etrecheck is clean. Use it or don't use it. >> >> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? >> >> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! > > AGAIN, why do you feel he needs to be "investigated"? Based on what? Just > because YOU personally don't like him? Back in 2014 I was happily helping him *test* his product. I still have copies of our email correspondence! He has also confirmed that he's about the same age as my son. Maybe that's why he's been unable to to best me! ;-) I've never claimed not to like the fellow! Other folk were slating the product on the Apple App Store, not me! https://i.ibb.co/6RyCVF5h/4-DB889-D8-A144-4-A99-97-B5-C02-B46-CF96-A9-1-105-c.jpg Do YOU think he became too greedy?