Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "David B." Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 20:07:46 +0100 Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: boaterdave@hotmail.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net G+0HfIi2+njufo9M79S/oQqYqqQlinq9YyCJbuyE40r+ntuhrM Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zgs7+bsIP0vr0S2CwLlo8l9Ipv0= sha256:sW92mDJ+Phb6LJtie0AegacA6O4MRrTacGGiRVUTlq4= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:181671 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:136515 On 08/08/2025 19:13, David B. wrote: > On 08/08/2025 18:21, Gremlin wrote: >> "David B." news:mfm1aeFqc46U1@mid.individual.net Fri, >> 08 Aug 2025 10:19:58 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >> >>> On 06/08/2025 06:58, Gremlin wrote: >>>> "David B." news:mfe8q5Fh1j1U1@mid.individual.net >>>> Tue, 05 Aug 2025 11:38:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>> >>>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>>> >>>> This has already been resolved. There is no malware present in the >>>> software. You have already confirmed that you continue to infer that's >>>> not the case because the author will not engage with you. You are once >>>> again, knowingly dishonestly, sliming the product. >>> >>> Perhaps you will categorically confirm that once one has given EtreCheck >>> "Full Disk Access" one has *NOT* left an open backdoor? >> >> This nonsense has already been covered as well. I asked you several times >> why you didn't apply the same standards to a variety of other software >> companies who's software does the same thing. Including Apple. You danced >> around my question and finally responded with the reason, because the >> author >> won't correspond with you. That's never going to be a satisifactory >> answer >> for your implications and wrongful accusations that you continue to make >> against the software. >> >> Etrecheck is clean. Use it or don't use it. > > What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? > > Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! *BUMP*!