Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!nntpspool01.opticnetworks.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus,alt.os.linux.ubuntu,comp.sys.laptops Subject: Re: cannot power "on" ASUS laptop after power outage Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:51:37 -0400 Organization: WeAreDecadatedDawtOrg Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: Wd1IOvI3IaLXxFYEPLUUPg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus:132 alt.os.linux.ubuntu:183055 comp.sys.laptops:2412 On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:32:44 -0700, mike Gave us: >On 10/20/2015 1:03 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 12:54:19 -0700, mike Gave us: >> >>> If you use an unlimited current source, the FET catches fire. >>> Somewhere around here I have a motherbord with a hole burned in it. >> >> Maybe you should learn how to spell 'motherboard' before you go >> expounding on them. >> >> Current is limited already because it is set by the voltage presented, >> not the capacity of the supply to feed a load. >> >> You are an electrical idiot as well, I see. >> >Perhaps if you read the text instead of snipping it, you'd have seen the >example that contradicts your arrogance. >So far, three UTI's on this post. >Wonder if I can trade 'em in for something useful? I sure have a lot >of 'em. You are real good at jacking off at the mouth about your petty, retarded non- "acronyms", but not surprisingly devoid of actual content that refutes what I stated. To state someone I hate, You'd be fired. You are ineffectual, at best. You could not debate this with any modicum of technical accuracy if your life depended on it. A pussy like you will try to let it die quietly than actually provide a substantive retort. Come back when you actually have a valid argument, chump. Your FET argument was a basic Ohm's law full tilt failure, and I easily pointed that fact out to you. Run, pussy boy, run!