Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2.programmer
Subject: Re: Prodos8 2.0.3 info
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:12:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Mac GUI
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <dog_cow-1470845577@macgui.com>
References: <eb8c33d9-4b17-4800-811f-bf37cd8b6291@googlegroups.com> <e4c8b226-7a23-4644-81a1-e2e64d58b31c@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:12:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ac9e0e4d7dd3957fb97803ee6801bab8"; logging-data="25357"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1K0gWqa3ZSAeq2MoAR1BQ"
User-Agent: Mac GUI Usenet
In-Reply-To: <e4c8b226-7a23-4644-81a1-e2e64d58b31c@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PmPB+JD1raH3oXokI5fO2hp88/4=
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.apple2.programmer:2905

John Brooks wrote:
> 
> There are several ProDOS design decisions which were good for their time,
> but I'm not sure are ideal going forward:
> 

And 15-character file names, anyone?

Would nice to see a backwards-compatible change to the directory structure
to allow a couple more chars.