Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Benoit0123 Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2.programmer Subject: Re: Query about ProDOS 8 Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 21:36:34 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Mac GUI Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 21:36:34 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8fd257c89236c7474f865581e23e18f3"; logging-data="26588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Vc7RVgpKHRjbzDMPzXeeT" User-Agent: Mac GUI Usenet In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:Oatr6B8nUH0rwpWxYR21yfmaxxw= Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.apple2.programmer:3895 Reply to last message from Antoine. Hello Antoine, How did you find that I am using BI 1.1 for the time being? ;-) I am using BI 1.1 and not BI 1.6 because I have an assembly listing for BI 1.1 on hand, thing that I have not for more modern BI version (cf. Sandy Mossberg's column in Nibble magazine: I've typed in the whole series into Merlin Pro then 8 in a past life). I might be wrong but I believe that the release notes between successive BI version from 1.0/1.1 up to latest 1.6 form only a quite thin document (reduced # of A4 pages) ;-). but I need to get the same absolute addressing between the paper listing and the electronic image of this system file for the time being. I do not think that the BI plays an active role (either positive or negative) for the issue I've described here (again I might be wrong...) Best regards, Benoît -- Growing old is mandatory.. growing up is optional.. But the other way round is as true.