Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.unit0.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Richard Ashbery Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.programmer Subject: Re: Rotating a Colour-Filled Square Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:48:05 +0000 (GMT) Organization: None Lines: 22 Message-ID: <581569aad1basura@invalid.addr.uk> References: <5811cae024basura@invalid.addr.uk> <58124834ffbasura@invalid.addr.uk> <58125f40fdbasura@invalid.addr.uk> <5812df5497basura@invalid.addr.uk> <5813dbaee2basura@invalid.addr.uk> X-Trace: individual.net A7dJ5MLDFT/XaupHrBdsggwcZOBUah+ymBw/2zFd0GTL9peXvX X-Orig-Path: uwclub.net!richard.ashbery Cancel-Lock: sha1:eDTXy8vc6FwyufeMU2l2SY9D968= User-Agent: Pluto/3.16 (RISC OS/5.25) NewsHound/v1.52-32 Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.acorn.programmer:5897 In article , druck wrote: > On 16/11/2019 14:21, Richard Ashbery wrote: > > In article , druck > > wrote: > >> On 15/11/2019 22:23, Sebastian Barthel wrote: > >>> And - to complete it a little bit more - here is the variant > >>> with TRIANGLEs as proposed by druck. > > > >>> SYS "OS_Plot",85,X1,Y1 > > > >> You do know BASIC has a PLOT keyword? So you can just do PLOT > >> 85,X1,Y1 That will make it a bit quicker. > > > > Not scientific but in practice no obvious discernible difference. > PERFORMANCE! Ferrari ;-) Richard