Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!not-for-mail
From: Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.std.c,comp.arch.embedded
Subject: Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 20:57:33 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <r8v8bt$k0f$1@reader2.panix.com>
References: <r8uo2j$4l2$1@solani.org> <r8upn1$89t$1@reader2.panix.com> <r8urd0$7el$1@solani.org> <r8uuj1$3j8$1@reader2.panix.com> <r8v23k$ak4$1@dont-email.me> <TOEsG.61838$iB5.60372@fx06.iad> <r8v75a$h2l$2@solani.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: c-68-46-86-141.hsd1.mn.comcast.net
X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1588798653 20495 68.46.86.141 (6 May 2020 20:57:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 20:57:33 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Xref: csiph.com comp.std.c:6086 comp.arch.embedded:29620

On 2020-05-06, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> wrote:

> Yes, but one benefit of standardization is providing a baseline of
> functionality that C programmers can target.

IMO, talking about a standardized baseline of library functionality
for bare-metal freestanding targets doesn't make much sense.  In my
experience, freestanding projects tend to be very idiosyncratic.

--
Grant